keoadmin
07-18-2009, 10:22 AM
The following report appeared in Mclean's Magazine on July 16, 2009. Kingston rates 28th out of 29 cities examined.
Are these the most important indicators for the city to consider? Are the assumptions valid?
Is Kingston's goal of becoming "Canada's most sustainable city" achievable in the short run?
-- Kingston Electors
Canada’s best and worst run cities (http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/16/canadas-best-and-worst-run-cities/)
Mclean's Magazine Jul 16, 2009
by Andrew Coyne
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/16/canadas-best-and-worst-run-cities/print/
This survey, the first of its kind in Canada, provides citizens in 31 cities across the country with comparative data on how well—or poorly—their city is run, measured by the cost and quality of the public services it delivers. (Why 31? We took the 30 largest cities in Canada, added whatever provincial capitals were not on the list, then subtracted a few cities from the Greater Toronto Area for better regional balance. Somehow that left 31.) Though the overall results—Burnaby, Saskatoon and Surrey, B.C. lead the pack; Charlottetown, Kingston, Ont., and Fredericton trail—will be of particular interest, they are less important than the process this is intended to kick off. We aim not merely to start some good barroom arguments, but to help voters to hold their representatives to better account, and indeed to help city governments themselves. For without some sort of yardstick to measure their performance, either against other cities or against their own past record, how can they hope to know whether they are succeeding?
To compile the survey, Maclean’s commissioned the Halifax-based Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, expanding on the institute’s earlier work measuring the performance of municipalities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Unlike other studies, this does not try to measure quality of life, or which city is the “best place to live.” Rather, it focuses on the contribution of local governments to this end.
This survey looks at a city’s efficiency—the cost of producing results—and the effectiveness of its services, including how well each city does when it comes to things like maintaining roads and parks, picking up garbage and putting out fires.
Overall Results (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/)
Economic Development (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=economicdevelopment)
Environmental Health (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=environmentalhealth)
Government and Finance (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=governancefinance)
Recreation and Culture (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=recreationculture)
Safety and Protection (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=safetyprotection)
Taxation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=taxation)
Transportation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=transportation)
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Technical appendix: how the survey was done (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRAppendix.pdf)
Raw data tables
Governance & Finance (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRgovernance.pdf)
Taxation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRtaxation.pdf)
Safety & Protection (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRsafety.pdf)
Transportation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRtransportation.pdf)
Environmental health (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRenvironmental.pdf)
Economic Development (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRdevelopment.pdf)
Recreation and Culture (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRrecreation.pdf)
List of outcomes indicators used (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Outcomes_indicators.doc)
List of input/control variables used (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Input_control_variables.doc)
Wish list of indicators for future surveys (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMRC_Wish_List.doc)
Comparison of local government reporting in selected countries (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Comparison_Local_government_reporting.doc)
Are these the most important indicators for the city to consider? Are the assumptions valid?
Is Kingston's goal of becoming "Canada's most sustainable city" achievable in the short run?
-- Kingston Electors
Canada’s best and worst run cities (http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/16/canadas-best-and-worst-run-cities/)
Mclean's Magazine Jul 16, 2009
by Andrew Coyne
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/16/canadas-best-and-worst-run-cities/print/
This survey, the first of its kind in Canada, provides citizens in 31 cities across the country with comparative data on how well—or poorly—their city is run, measured by the cost and quality of the public services it delivers. (Why 31? We took the 30 largest cities in Canada, added whatever provincial capitals were not on the list, then subtracted a few cities from the Greater Toronto Area for better regional balance. Somehow that left 31.) Though the overall results—Burnaby, Saskatoon and Surrey, B.C. lead the pack; Charlottetown, Kingston, Ont., and Fredericton trail—will be of particular interest, they are less important than the process this is intended to kick off. We aim not merely to start some good barroom arguments, but to help voters to hold their representatives to better account, and indeed to help city governments themselves. For without some sort of yardstick to measure their performance, either against other cities or against their own past record, how can they hope to know whether they are succeeding?
To compile the survey, Maclean’s commissioned the Halifax-based Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, expanding on the institute’s earlier work measuring the performance of municipalities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Unlike other studies, this does not try to measure quality of life, or which city is the “best place to live.” Rather, it focuses on the contribution of local governments to this end.
This survey looks at a city’s efficiency—the cost of producing results—and the effectiveness of its services, including how well each city does when it comes to things like maintaining roads and parks, picking up garbage and putting out fires.
Overall Results (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/)
Economic Development (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=economicdevelopment)
Environmental Health (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=environmentalhealth)
Government and Finance (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=governancefinance)
Recreation and Culture (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=recreationculture)
Safety and Protection (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=safetyprotection)
Taxation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=taxation)
Transportation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/categories.php?c=transportation)
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Technical appendix: how the survey was done (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRAppendix.pdf)
Raw data tables
Governance & Finance (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRgovernance.pdf)
Taxation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRtaxation.pdf)
Safety & Protection (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRsafety.pdf)
Transportation (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRtransportation.pdf)
Environmental health (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRenvironmental.pdf)
Economic Development (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRdevelopment.pdf)
Recreation and Culture (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMPRrecreation.pdf)
List of outcomes indicators used (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Outcomes_indicators.doc)
List of input/control variables used (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Input_control_variables.doc)
Wish list of indicators for future surveys (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/NMRC_Wish_List.doc)
Comparison of local government reporting in selected countries (http://quizzes.macleans.ca/cities/docs/Comparison_Local_government_reporting.doc)