PDA

View Full Version : Worldwatch: 2007 State Of The World Optimism About Cities



posting
01-23-2007, 10:26 AM
WORLDWATCH: 2007 STATE OF THE WORLD OPTIMISM ABOUT CITIES

In 2005, about 3.2 billion people, or 49% of the world's total population of 6.46 billion, lived in cities. About 1 billion live in slums without adequate shelter or basic services. Urbanization in Europe and North America is relatively stable with 75% of the population already living in cities but Africa and Asia are rapidly urbanizing. It is expected that 88% of the human population growth from 2000-2030 will be urban dwellers in low-and medium-income countries in Africa and Asia and half of the city dwellers in those countries will live in slums.

The latest Worldwatch Institute's State of the World report focuses on urbanization. On the whole, most of the cities in the world are unsustainable but the high density offers the opportunity for economies of scale to provide services to the poor and protect natural resources. Among the signs of hope as outlined in the chapter by Kai Lee of Williams College in Massachusetts are:
Plans for a new developments for eco-cities. For example, construction is to begin this year on a new city, Dongtan in China, planned by the firm Arup, with windmills, green roofs, solar panels, 80% recycling of waste, and the only vehicles allowed powered by electricity or fuel cells. In theory, Dongtan will be nearly self-sufficient in food and water.
Development of institutional and/or business models allowing for development of less expensive, more flexible infrastructure and the delivery of water, sanitation and other services which are affordable and clean to low-income residents. For example, decentralizing of government, such as participatory budgeting, allows slum dwellers to help themselves in meeting their needs for nature's services.
Green architecture such as the circular metabolism used in the design of the 15-story IBM headquarters in Kuala Lumpur, one of the first green skyscrapers designed by Ken Yeang and built in 1992, which uses vertical landscaping to capture water which in turn helps to cool the building. (In July 2006, Business Week included it as one of the architectural 'Green Wonders of the World.') The eco-industrial park in Kalundborg, Denmark is another example where wastes from one industrial activity (oil refining) are burned to produce electricity in a power plant which in turn provides heat for commercial fish production. By-products of combustion are used for wallboard and concrete manufacturing.
Green infrastructure, such as natural areas and corridors, serving as both green space and functions such as flood control, cleaning waste water and recreational areas.
Developing countries leapfrogging over the industrialized countries rigid and expensive infrastructure. For example, many countries never laid down telephone lines and leapfrogged to wireless phone systems. Large-scale solar energy is being used in Rizhao, China. For a long time, some cities have had human garbage sorters redirecting a massive amount of what would have been waste.
Reduction in corruption. Singapore's conversion to modernity with its compact urban deisgn and mass transit is credited as due to "a competent, incorruptible government".Lee suggests that cities will always engage in trade and interaction with markets including outlying rural areas so that sustainable cities doesn't mean self-sufficient cities. Cities depend on many ecosystems and Lee writes that none of the cities discussed are sustainable yet because that dependence is not durable over the long run. However, he concludes on an optimistic note, "Creating urban habitats that deliver the bounty of nature in a sustainable fashion to the inhabitants of cities in all societies is an opportunity within our reach, as well as a cardinal test of our humanity."

Lee, Kai N. An Urbanizing World in Worldwatch Institute. 2007 State of the World: Our Urban Future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2007.

http://www2.wwnorton.com/catalog/fall06/032923.htm (http://www2.wwnorton.com/catalog/fall06/032923.htm) and www.worldwatch.org (http://www.worldwatch.org/)

--source, THE GALLON ENVIRONMENT LETTER Vol. 12, No. 1, January 22, 2007

Peter Walker
01-24-2007, 09:11 PM
"Singapore ... a competent, incorruptibe government"

I seem to recall a classroom discussion several years ago where, on the topic of ethics", an international student from the far east suggested that, to achieve ethical government, it was important to assure that elected officials were so well paid that (a) there was no need to accept bribes, and (b) extremely competent (and highly paid elsewhere) people were willing to run for office because they were not going to be forced to take huge drops in pay. I think the example he offered was Singapore.

Does anybody know what sort of salaries Singapore pays its government officials?

I must confess that I admire many of our most competent politicians for, amongst other things, being willing to work so hard and put up with so much disrespect when they could be much better paid elsewhere.

Dogma
01-29-2007, 08:10 PM
There is no relation to politics and pay.

Most if not all do not do this for the money. Most if lawyers could be an example would and cold practice privately and make more money (per hour served) than any political member of council or parliment. I beleive the council members may make 10,000 a year for the amount of hours put in...may make minimum wage.

Florence
02-01-2007, 06:06 PM
Dogma - as an old person, I BEG you to discover spell check. I know that posting here does not allow spell check. Many of us old souls are put off by bad spelling. We assume that your thoughts are shaky as is your spelling. I personally doubt if that is the case, but many will make the connection. You have much to contribute, please do not undercut yourself. You may need an editor.

Dogma
02-02-2007, 08:56 AM
I agree from re-reading the insert that one (1) word is misspelled. The premise though was clear enough to make the philosophical argument.

In deed; if I was an "old folk" I would likely have retirements timetable to spend writing articles and spell checking all of ones inserts.

I agree though that semantics are important.

Florence
02-04-2007, 09:37 PM
There is no relationbetween) to politics and pay.

Most, if not all do not do this for the money. Most if lawyers could beas) an example would and cold could)practice privately and make more money (per hour served) than any political member of council or parliment.(parliament) I beleive the council members may make 10,000 a year for the amount of hours put in...may make minimum wage.

Dogma
02-05-2007, 10:12 AM
Undoubting; there is more than one critical error.

Again; if I was an "old folk" I would have the flexible timetable to address, write and spell check all of ones inserts.

I agree though that semantics are important.

Any comments on the subject at hand?

Edgewaters
03-30-2007, 05:32 AM
"Singapore ... a competent, incorruptibe government"

I seem to recall a classroom discussion several years ago where, on the topic of ethics", an international student from the far east suggested that, to achieve ethical government, it was important to assure that elected officials were so well paid that (a) there was no need to accept bribes, and (b) extremely competent (and highly paid elsewhere) people were willing to run for office because they were not going to be forced to take huge drops in pay. I think the example he offered was Singapore.

Does anybody know what sort of salaries Singapore pays its government officials?

I must confess that I admire many of our most competent politicians for, amongst other things, being willing to work so hard and put up with so much disrespect when they could be much better paid elsewhere.


I don't know about the salaries, but I can tell you that a major reason for the low level of corruption in Singapore is due to the laws regarding corruption. There are stiff penalties; but probably more important is that there are reverse onus clauses, and extraordinarily high levels of detection, pursuit, and conviction - the latter often involving imprisonment sentences. Definitions in the legislation are very broad, allowing pursuit for a wide manner of behaviours; and evidence requirements are relatively low (for instance, wealth disproportionate to income is considered conclusive evidence of a charge of corruption). Conviction rates exceed 95%, prosecution rates for pursuable cases top 85%. The Prevention of Corruption Act has been called a "regime of punishment".

I think this has much, much more to do with low levels of corruption in Singapore than the salaries being paid.

BornAndRaised
03-31-2007, 01:22 AM
It seems to me that politicians that are caught in a scandal does not get the same treatment than someone who commits a crime on the street. What makes it less a crime for a politician to receive a $20,000 kickback for awarding a contract than for a common thief to steal a $20,000 car. Theft is theft and should be treated as such.

Here is an interesting bunch of government scandals
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdngovernment/scandals.html

Lydia
04-02-2007, 01:09 AM
Hell, when a politican goes bad, we not only don't punish him the same as an ordinary person, We compensate him with millions of dollars to leave.

I would love to see all his/her partners belonging and his/her belongings and financial assets take from them and sold to compensate their victims (US). I wonder if that would have any affect. I would also love to see that the person would be unbondable and never allowed to run for a political position ever again.

Singapore's punishment might be too harsh but I certain think there is a middle ground.